However, the Truth is that virtualization is multi-vendor, multi-technology, and inherently heterogeneous. So: How will these diverse technologies be managed in the future? Here are some observations:
- People are confusing ‘Virtualization’ with VMware (but remember, there are more types of virtualization than just hypervisors for software!)
- VMware’s scope is limited to X86 Platforms. Most organizations have more than X86.
- There are other types of Virtualization within other platforms (Example: Mainframe LPARs, Solaris containers/Zones, HP VPARs).
- There are even Virtualization alternatives in X86 (XenSource, Xen/RHEL, Xen/SuSE, and SWSoft Virtuozzo and others).
- There are different types of Virtualization (JVM, VLANs in the network domain, SAN & NAS in the storage domain, not to mention Incipient and 3Par).
- VMM Virtualization is an OS feature and it’s price will be commoditized to $0 over time. Evidence:
- Historically LPARs came with MVS
- Sun does not charge extra for Containers/Zones
- IBM AIX & HP-UX don’t charge extra either
- JVM’s are free.
- VLAN-ing comes built-in into Switch Firmware
- You can get NAS for free or pay for specially-tuned version in Proprietary Hardware (NetApps)
- Watch out in the SAN-space but it will be interesting to see where that goes with iSCSI and 10Gig Ethernet etc. - A comment on X86 VMM-pricing:
- Red Hat will deliver Xen for free in RH5
- SuSE will deliver Xen for free in SuSE 10.x
- Intel supports it for free in Intel-VT chips
- AMD supports for free in their Pacifica chips
- XenSource costs 25% of VMware and will eventually be acquired by somebody who will give it away for free as part of something else
This is the next impending management crisis - management, automation, and optimization of virtualized computation, containers, storage, and networking.
1 comment:
- Red Hat will deliver Xen for free in RH5
- SuSE will deliver Xen for free in SuSE 10.x
Free? The last time I checked, RHEL and SUSE were available for *purchase*, not given away.
Or is this referring to having free *hosted* virtualization, as opposed to bare-metal? If so, VMware are already doing this with their VMware Server product.
- Intel supports it for free in Intel-VT chips
- AMD supports for free in their Pacifica chips
They also support SSL3 which, like VT and Pacifica, is useless without software that supports it.
Hardware support is not a panacea and is not always faster than software. (just ask Intel how well their hardware-based x-86 emulation ran on Itanium....)
At the moment hardware virtualization support only works for the CPU. Any i/o incurs a massive overhead which, in real world workloads, generally makes it slower than a software based hypervisor.
That will likely change in the future but, at the moment, software is the way to go.
Post a Comment